Good Samaritan Act - Reynoso v. Newman Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Good Samaritan Act - Reynoso v. Newman - Essay ExampleWith respect to the case, he was plaintiff and appellant. The refrainant and respondent was Mr. Jeffrey L. Newman (FindLaw, REYNOSO v. NEWMAN). Outcome The Good Samaritan Laws are those that defend people who decide to serve others as similar to one who are injured or are ill. This law differs from one jurisdiction to another. The principles that pertains the Good Samaritan laws command in countries such as Australia where the foundation of the legal system is the English Common Law. The case here is related to the Good Samaritan Act. Bruce Adams who was a DDS by his transmission line had put his patient named Orlando Reynoso under general anesthesia. The reason behind this was that Mr. Adams wanted to perform oral surgery. According to the records, it is evident that San Diego county dentist has been administering the anesthesia as Reynoso was mentally retarded by birth. As a result he couldnt sit calmly throughout the dental procedure. After Mr. Reynoso was sent to the recovery room, it was know by the dentist that the oxygen saturation levels of the patient were low. Therefore, according to the recommendations of Dr. Lo, Reynoso was sent to the hospital for further treatment in which an aspiration related to blood dexterity arise. Later Mr. Adams called up his friend, a physician named Jeffrey L. Newman, in order to gain second opinion. Mr. Newman arrived shortly after Mr. Adams called him.